(Not that I totally agree with this opinion letter, but it is much better than the DNRC issuing a blank check to MAWC with no conditions. Interesting point of view...)
http://www.dailyinterlake.com/members/letter-bottling-plant-ok-but-only-with-conditions/article_4bd3fe86-9330-11e6-8a08-67e5b7703872.html?mode=story
Personally I don't think the State would be willing to spend the money to create the necessary infrastructure to effectively oversee a bottling plant operation that would actually protect wells, wildlife, and wetlands. A new dept with staff (including legal) would need to be created to monitor all the interacting conditions and enforce compliance.
Friday, October 21, 2016
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Commissioners, Where Do You Stand?
Certainly the great majority of Flathead County residents are opposed to this project...
http://flatheadbeacon.com/2016/10/11/commissioners-where-do-you-stand/Sunday, October 2, 2016
Timber Company Tells California Town, Go Find Your Own Water
WEED,
Calif. — The water that gurgles from a spring on the edge of this
Northern California logging town is so pristine that for more than a
century it has been piped directly to the wooden homes spread across
hills and gullies.
To
the residents of Weed, which sits in the foothills of Mount Shasta, a
snow-capped dormant volcano, the spring water is a blessing during a
time of severe and prolonged drought.
To the lumber company that owns the land where the spring is, the water is a business opportunity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/california-drought-weed-mount-shasta.html?_r=0
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)